<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for NetworkIP Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.networkip.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.networkip.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Will MetroPCS and Leap Wireless Merge? by Brian Kirk</title>
		<link>http://blog.networkip.net/2009/09/13/138/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.networkip.net/?p=138#comment-87</guid>
		<description>And just like that T-Mobile's parent company Deutsche Telekom is eyeing Sprint Nextel: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/6180195/T-Mobile-owner-eyes-multi-billion-dollar-bid-for-Sprint.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just like that T-Mobile&#8217;s parent company Deutsche Telekom is eyeing Sprint Nextel: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/6180195/T-Mobile-owner-eyes-multi-billion-dollar-bid-for-Sprint.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/6180195/T-Mobile-owner-eyes-multi-billion-dollar-bid-for-Sprint.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Embrace the Open-Source Community by Brian Kirk</title>
		<link>http://blog.networkip.net/2008/06/16/embrace-the-open-source-community/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkip.wordpress.com/?p=17#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Nokia's stance on Symbian isn't working out like they hoped...trying real hard not to say, "I told you so!"

See today's update from Om Malik on the state of Symbian &#38; Nokia. As part of this post, is a link to another great Giga Om post on what's wrong at Nokia: http://gigaom.com/2009/07/17/nokia-sells-off-symbians-professional-services-business/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nokia&#8217;s stance on Symbian isn&#8217;t working out like they hoped&#8230;trying real hard not to say, &#8220;I told you so!&#8221;</p>
<p>See today&#8217;s update from Om Malik on the state of Symbian &amp; Nokia. As part of this post, is a link to another great Giga Om post on what&#8217;s wrong at Nokia: <a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/07/17/nokia-sells-off-symbians-professional-services-business/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2009/07/17/nokia-sells-off-symbians-professional-services-business/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Remaining Optimistic About CTIA &#8216;09 by Brian Kirk</title>
		<link>http://blog.networkip.net/2009/04/01/remaining-optimistic-about-ctia-09/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.networkip.net/?p=114#comment-55</guid>
		<description>a big thanks to Stacey Higginbotham at GigaOM for keeping us up to date with the status of the mobile operators &#38; MVNOs in the U.S.

MetroPCS Boosts Q1 Subscribers by 51%

It’s a good time to be a budget cell phone company, judging by the subscriber numbers out this morning from MetroPCS. The cellular operator added 687,000 net new subscribers in the first quarter of this year, up 51 percent over last quarter’s record number. MetroPCS, which provides flat-rate service on a month-to-month basis to customers in limited markets, now has a total of 6 million subscribers vs. 4.4 million in the same period a year ago. It’s capitalizing on the financial crisis to emphasize its pre-paid cell plans, flat-rate pricing and good in-home coverage, which enables subscribers to dump their land lines. It also, however, saw churn rise from to 5 percent from 4 percent, reflecting a rise in the amount of turnover from month to month via subscribers who drop or then restart their plans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a big thanks to Stacey Higginbotham at GigaOM for keeping us up to date with the status of the mobile operators &amp; MVNOs in the U.S.</p>
<p>MetroPCS Boosts Q1 Subscribers by 51%</p>
<p>It’s a good time to be a budget cell phone company, judging by the subscriber numbers out this morning from MetroPCS. The cellular operator added 687,000 net new subscribers in the first quarter of this year, up 51 percent over last quarter’s record number. MetroPCS, which provides flat-rate service on a month-to-month basis to customers in limited markets, now has a total of 6 million subscribers vs. 4.4 million in the same period a year ago. It’s capitalizing on the financial crisis to emphasize its pre-paid cell plans, flat-rate pricing and good in-home coverage, which enables subscribers to dump their land lines. It also, however, saw churn rise from to 5 percent from 4 percent, reflecting a rise in the amount of turnover from month to month via subscribers who drop or then restart their plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mobile Money Transfer by &#187; Mobile Money Transfer</title>
		<link>http://blog.networkip.net/2008/11/09/mobile-money-transfer/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Mobile Money Transfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.networkip.net/?p=62#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] Payments News for Payments Professionals from Glenbrook Partners wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt Earlier this week I departed from Austin &#38; boarded one of three flights that would eventually land me in Dubai, which is serving as this year’s host city for the Mobile Money Transfer (MMT) conference that I will participate in. As noted by the conference organizers, there are significant profits to be made out of MMT. Only a finite group of market leaders such as Safaricom who developed M-PESA &#38; Globe’s G-Cash have proven it, &#38; now mobile network operators, banks, micro-finance ins [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Payments News for Payments Professionals from Glenbrook Partners wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt Earlier this week I departed from Austin &#38; boarded one of three flights that would eventually land me in Dubai, which is serving as this year’s host city for the Mobile Money Transfer (MMT) conference that I will participate in. As noted by the conference organizers, there are significant profits to be made out of MMT. Only a finite group of market leaders such as Safaricom who developed M-PESA &#38; Globe’s G-Cash have proven it, &#38; now mobile network operators, banks, micro-finance ins [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why All The Hype With Cloud Computing? by Brian Kirk</title>
		<link>http://blog.networkip.net/2008/10/29/why-all-the-hype-with-cloud-computing/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkip.wordpress.com/?p=197#comment-31</guid>
		<description>A colleague of mine who is quite involved in a number of IT forums said to me that he has heard that EC2 has been a great place for application developers to get their applications up &#038; running in order to begin doing business. However, as soon as load exists (load wasn’t quantified), EC2 has not scaled very well. Can anyone else comment on EC2’s ability to scale?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A colleague of mine who is quite involved in a number of IT forums said to me that he has heard that EC2 has been a great place for application developers to get their applications up &#038; running in order to begin doing business. However, as soon as load exists (load wasn’t quantified), EC2 has not scaled very well. Can anyone else comment on EC2’s ability to scale?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mobile Phones offer More Than Just Voice by Brian Kirk</title>
		<link>http://blog.networkip.net/2008/10/15/mobile-phones-offer-more-than-just-voice/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkip.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-29</guid>
		<description>A relevant comment clipped from Kevin Tofel of jkOnTheRun titled "Happy 25th Anniversary of the first commercial cellular call!:

"According to data published by Japan’s Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC) as reported by Japan Today, mobile calls accounted for 44.8% of total hours of telecommunications traffic in the fiscal year ending 31 March 2007, eclipsing fixed line phone traffic for the first time ever."

Amazing when you think about it this way: Bell's first phone call over a wire took place back in 1876, and for over 132 years we've spent time gabbing on the POTS, or Plain Old Telephone Service. In just 25 years, we actually have more wireless calls than wired in some areas of the world."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A relevant comment clipped from Kevin Tofel of jkOnTheRun titled &#8220;Happy 25th Anniversary of the first commercial cellular call!:</p>
<p>&#8220;According to data published by Japan’s Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC) as reported by Japan Today, mobile calls accounted for 44.8% of total hours of telecommunications traffic in the fiscal year ending 31 March 2007, eclipsing fixed line phone traffic for the first time ever.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amazing when you think about it this way: Bell&#8217;s first phone call over a wire took place back in 1876, and for over 132 years we&#8217;ve spent time gabbing on the POTS, or Plain Old Telephone Service. In just 25 years, we actually have more wireless calls than wired in some areas of the world.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The U.S. is Texting, not Talking by Brian Kirk</title>
		<link>http://blog.networkip.net/2008/10/13/the-us-is-texting-not-talking/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkip.wordpress.com/?p=174#comment-28</guid>
		<description>just in this morning from the New York Times:

Verizon Wireless is refuting reports it will introduce a 3-cent fee for all mobile-terminated messages delivered across its network. According to an email sent last week by Verizon billing partner OpenMarket, the operator planned to append a 3-cent charge to both standard-rate and premium text programs. But in a subsequent email distributed to the press, Verizon spokesperson Jeffrey Nelson writes "We are currently assessing how to best address the changing messaging marketplace, and are communicating with messaging aggregators, our valued content partners, our technology business partners and, importantly, our friends in the non-profit and public policy arenas. To that end, we recently notified text messaging aggregators--those for-profit companies that provide services to content providers to aggregate and bill for their text messaging programs--that we are exploring ways to offset significantly increased costs for delivering billions upon billions of text messages each month."

According to Nelson, the rate hike outlined in the OpenMarket email "has been mistakenly characterized as a final decision to implement. We don't envision this type of change to in any way affect non-profit organizations or political and advocacy organizations." He adds that Verizon Wireless has not increased the per-message cost to aggregators since introducing its messaging service in 2003, and the carrier has "never envisioned a cost to consumers or content companies, but rather on content aggregators themselves."  In an interview with The New York Times, Nelson maintained Verizon Wireless has not set any specific price for text delivery or a date a new fee might go into effect: "There is nothing imminent, November 1 or any other date."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just in this morning from the New York Times:</p>
<p>Verizon Wireless is refuting reports it will introduce a 3-cent fee for all mobile-terminated messages delivered across its network. According to an email sent last week by Verizon billing partner OpenMarket, the operator planned to append a 3-cent charge to both standard-rate and premium text programs. But in a subsequent email distributed to the press, Verizon spokesperson Jeffrey Nelson writes &#8220;We are currently assessing how to best address the changing messaging marketplace, and are communicating with messaging aggregators, our valued content partners, our technology business partners and, importantly, our friends in the non-profit and public policy arenas. To that end, we recently notified text messaging aggregators&#8211;those for-profit companies that provide services to content providers to aggregate and bill for their text messaging programs&#8211;that we are exploring ways to offset significantly increased costs for delivering billions upon billions of text messages each month.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to Nelson, the rate hike outlined in the OpenMarket email &#8220;has been mistakenly characterized as a final decision to implement. We don&#8217;t envision this type of change to in any way affect non-profit organizations or political and advocacy organizations.&#8221; He adds that Verizon Wireless has not increased the per-message cost to aggregators since introducing its messaging service in 2003, and the carrier has &#8220;never envisioned a cost to consumers or content companies, but rather on content aggregators themselves.&#8221;  In an interview with The New York Times, Nelson maintained Verizon Wireless has not set any specific price for text delivery or a date a new fee might go into effect: &#8220;There is nothing imminent, November 1 or any other date.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mobile Payments Market Forecast for 2013 by John Levett</title>
		<link>http://blog.networkip.net/2008/09/08/mobile-payments-market-forecast-for-2013/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>John Levett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkip.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Juniper Research forecasts in excess of 100m Mobile Users to make International Money Transfers by 2013

Hampshire, UK – 30th September 2008: A new analysis by Juniper Research of the rapidly evolving market for money transfer and remittances via mobile phones forecasts that in excess of 100m users globally will use their mobile phones to make international money transfers by 2013. These cross border mobile money transfers are currently in their infancy, but are expected to gain traction over the next two to three years, especially on migration routes such as Philippines/Middle East and Mexico/USA.

The report found that there is a significant opportunity for mobile money transfer service providers and vendors, for both national services between mobile users in a single country and internationally. The study explores how mobile money transfer will transform the ability of the ‘underbanked’ population and migrant workers to make remittances, using their mobile phones as mobile wallets.

Report author Howard Wilcox explained: "The vast increase in migrant workers globally has fuelled the number of remittances being sent home to friends and families regularly. The mobile phone will become a vital enabler in developing countries because often many more people have phones than have bank accounts. The GSM Association Mobile Money Transfer global initiative emphasises the importance that is attached to this across the mobile industry as a whole."

Highlights from the report include:
• Mobile international transfers are forecast to grow in frequency as users become more accustomed to the process, exceeding one per month by 2013 on average globally.
• The opportunity for companies providing national and international money transfer services is forecast to exceed $5bn by 2013.
• The top 3 regions (W. Europe, N. America and Africa &#38; Middle East) will represent over 75% of the global international mobile money transfer gross transaction value by 2013.

The report provides six year regional forecasts of mobile money transfers and remittances, providing data on subscriber take-up, transaction sizes and volumes for both national (domestic) and international transactions. Crucially, the report identifies the incremental ARPU opportunity for mobile network operators, arising from these new services. Case studies and interviews with companies pioneering in this market are also featured.

Whitepapers and further details of the study, ‘Mobile Payment Markets: Mobile Money Transfers and Remittances 2008-2013’ can be freely downloaded from www.juniperresearch.com.  Alternatively please contact John Levett at john.levett@juniperresearch.com, telephone +44(0)1256 830002.

Further reports in the Mobile Payments Series are:
•	Mobile Payment Markets: Digital and Physical Goods 2008-2013 (published in July 2008)
•	Mobile Payment Markets: Contactless NFC 2008-2013 (published in July 2008)
•	Mobile Payment Markets: Strategies and Forecasts 2008-2013 (published in September 2008)

Juniper Research provides research and analytical services to the global hi-tech communications sector, providing consultancy, analyst reports and industry commentary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Juniper Research forecasts in excess of 100m Mobile Users to make International Money Transfers by 2013</p>
<p>Hampshire, UK – 30th September 2008: A new analysis by Juniper Research of the rapidly evolving market for money transfer and remittances via mobile phones forecasts that in excess of 100m users globally will use their mobile phones to make international money transfers by 2013. These cross border mobile money transfers are currently in their infancy, but are expected to gain traction over the next two to three years, especially on migration routes such as Philippines/Middle East and Mexico/USA.</p>
<p>The report found that there is a significant opportunity for mobile money transfer service providers and vendors, for both national services between mobile users in a single country and internationally. The study explores how mobile money transfer will transform the ability of the ‘underbanked’ population and migrant workers to make remittances, using their mobile phones as mobile wallets.</p>
<p>Report author Howard Wilcox explained: &#8220;The vast increase in migrant workers globally has fuelled the number of remittances being sent home to friends and families regularly. The mobile phone will become a vital enabler in developing countries because often many more people have phones than have bank accounts. The GSM Association Mobile Money Transfer global initiative emphasises the importance that is attached to this across the mobile industry as a whole.&#8221;</p>
<p>Highlights from the report include:<br />
• Mobile international transfers are forecast to grow in frequency as users become more accustomed to the process, exceeding one per month by 2013 on average globally.<br />
• The opportunity for companies providing national and international money transfer services is forecast to exceed $5bn by 2013.<br />
• The top 3 regions (W. Europe, N. America and Africa &amp; Middle East) will represent over 75% of the global international mobile money transfer gross transaction value by 2013.</p>
<p>The report provides six year regional forecasts of mobile money transfers and remittances, providing data on subscriber take-up, transaction sizes and volumes for both national (domestic) and international transactions. Crucially, the report identifies the incremental ARPU opportunity for mobile network operators, arising from these new services. Case studies and interviews with companies pioneering in this market are also featured.</p>
<p>Whitepapers and further details of the study, ‘Mobile Payment Markets: Mobile Money Transfers and Remittances 2008-2013’ can be freely downloaded from <a href="http://www.juniperresearch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.juniperresearch.com</a>.  Alternatively please contact John Levett at <a href="mailto:john.levett@juniperresearch.com">john.levett@juniperresearch.com</a>, telephone +44(0)1256 830002.</p>
<p>Further reports in the Mobile Payments Series are:<br />
•	Mobile Payment Markets: Digital and Physical Goods 2008-2013 (published in July 2008)<br />
•	Mobile Payment Markets: Contactless NFC 2008-2013 (published in July 2008)<br />
•	Mobile Payment Markets: Strategies and Forecasts 2008-2013 (published in September 2008)</p>
<p>Juniper Research provides research and analytical services to the global hi-tech communications sector, providing consultancy, analyst reports and industry commentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple Shifts the Mobile Industry by &#187; Apple Shifts the Mobile Industry &#187; Mac Life</title>
		<link>http://blog.networkip.net/2008/09/23/apple-shifts-the-mobile-industry/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Apple Shifts the Mobile Industry &#187; Mac Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkip.wordpress.com/?p=156#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple news by Brian Kirk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple news by Brian Kirk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Google Chrome? by Google Chrome News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Google Chrome?</title>
		<link>http://blog.networkip.net/2008/09/10/why-google-chrome/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Google Chrome?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkip.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptSince Google released its new web browser, Chrome, last week there has been so much chatter on the web about its features, how it stacks up to Internet Explorer (IE), Firefox, &#38; Safari, &#38; maybe the most important question on everyone’s &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptSince Google released its new web browser, Chrome, last week there has been so much chatter on the web about its features, how it stacks up to Internet Explorer (IE), Firefox, &#38; Safari, &#38; maybe the most important question on everyone’s &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

